No you haven't.
There is essentially one question, one that you have dodged the entire thread:
Was Paul lying in 1996 or in 2001?
He made one statement about the newsletters in '96, and another completely contradictory statement about them in '01.
Only one of the statements can be accurate, which means that the other is a lie.
So again: Which one was the lie?
“Only one of the statements can be accurate, which means that the other is a lie.”
1996 was the ‘lie’ which he explained and repudiated in 2001.
When will you live up to your documented lies in this thread, such as those about
- the timetable of Thompson’s support for Aristide
- the nature of Paul’s military service
- how or why Fred was fooled by Aristide
- your claims about what I’ve said or not said in this thread, which I rebutted several times, backed up by links to the posts?
Your timeline od the Texas Monthly article - another lie.
You said in #9
“. In Texas Monthly and earlier this week he denied writing them and said anyone who thinks them is small minded.”
It was in 2001.
Paul told one white lie in 1996 - I almost need 3 hands to count the whoppers you’ve told on this thread alone. :)