Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPyouth
Fred wasn't asked a question.

Nice try. The others answered the question regarding the Reagan coalition. Fred asked to answer it, and didn't, choosing instead to launch off on Huck.

It was deliberate. He planned to launch on Huck, and wanted to launch on Huck, and took this opportunity so he didn't have to do it when asked a direct question by the moderator.

1,185 posted on 01/10/2008 6:41:15 PM PST by fideist (Proud Father of a U.S. Marine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1067 | View Replies ]


To: fideist

Brit just hosed RUPAUL!


1,223 posted on 01/10/2008 6:42:24 PM PST by IGOTMINE (1911s FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

To: fideist

You are correct, but Thompson KNOWS he has to attack somebody or be left for dead...


1,227 posted on 01/10/2008 6:42:25 PM PST by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

To: fideist

L.Ron Paul (to Willard): “Make fun, buddy.”

He’s f’n unbalanced.


1,270 posted on 01/10/2008 6:43:36 PM PST by Petronski (Slick Willard LOVES government mandates. He said so himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

To: fideist

Huckabee was asked about the Reagan coalition, in response to his campaign manager’s comments about it. Fred jumped in to point out that Huck’s record is not conservative despite Huckabee’s campaign rhetoric.


1,287 posted on 01/10/2008 6:44:03 PM PST by RebekahT ("Government is not the solution to the problem, government is the problem." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

To: fideist
yes it was deliberate, but given the way Fox has tried to crowd him out by limiting both questions to him and his response time to them do you think it was better to waste time on a question any one who knows his record can surmise or to take on some one trying to falsely cloak himself as a conservative?
2,568 posted on 01/10/2008 7:37:48 PM PST by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

To: fideist
Nice try. The others answered the question regarding the Reagan coalition.

Hmmm below is what Fred Thompson said. Regarding the Reagan Coalition, he stated what it stood for, and then let the people know what Huckabee's positions have been.

"This is a battle over the heart and soul of the Republican party, and its future. One one hand, you have the Reagan Revolution and Coalition of limited government and strong national security. On the other hand, you have the direction that Governor Huckabee would take us in. He would be a Christian leader, but would also bring about liberal economic policies; liberal foreign policies. He believes we have an arrogant foreign policing, in the tradition of "blame America first". He believes Guantanamo should be closed down, and those enemy combatants brought here to the United States, to find their way into the court system, eventually. He believes in tax-payer funded programs for illegals, as he did in Arkansas. He has the endorsement of the National Education Association, and the NEA said it was because of his opposition to vouchers. He said he would sign a bill to ban smoking nationwide. So much for Federalism. So much for states rights. That's not a model of the Reagan Coalition. That's a model of the democratic party."

3,625 posted on 01/10/2008 10:37:16 PM PST by GOPyouth ("It's Back-to-Basics time for American Conservatism!" - Rush Limbaugh 01-04-08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson