Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

Uh, I believe I summarily rejected all four. Don’t see any defenses for any of them.


385 posted on 01/10/2008 6:05:44 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Robinson

I guess I just find the notion of separating being “constitutionally minded, small government fiscal conservatives” from “National Defense, Border Security, Guns and Life”. Guns and life are intrinsically constitutional issues. National defense and border security are going to be compromised if they have to compete with liberal social engineering and welfare programs for resources and are being hamstrung by overloaded bureaucracies.


390 posted on 01/10/2008 6:14:13 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson