Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rick.Donaldson
Romney is saying simply that Ham Radio should remain free and unencumbered by government regulation expansions.

This is a conservative view.

He was not dissing Ham radio. He has no reason to.

You people are totally off base here. Interoperability involves frequencies that are not used by current Ham operations. It has nothing, or should have nothing to do with Ham. If it did, it would involve testing,licensing, certified equipment and the elimination of overlapping users.

The frequency spectrum is totally different and the Ham is necessary when all that fails. Government would destroy ham radio, not assist it.

You want that?

Good grief!

48 posted on 01/10/2008 12:10:43 PM PST by Cold Heat (Mitt....2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat
"You people are totally off base here. Interoperability involves frequencies that are not used by current Ham operations"

It is you that are 'off base.'

The capability to operate on all frequencies, and modes in emergencies could easily be added to any amateur station that chose to expand their license and capabilities, but Romney has made himself clear that he opposes this public intrusion into the domain of the controllers.

I would have willingly voted for him in the past election, but he has shown his true colors, and is now off my list for sure.

229 posted on 03/11/2009 7:49:48 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson