To: Jokelahoma
I posted this so Hunter fans here will contact the powers that be and give them hell. If you want to rationalize their actions, that’s your business. If they changed the criteria to who had committed delegates after 3 primaries, Rudy and Fred and Paul would have been excluded instead. And I reckon their followers would be pitchin a fit, no?
138 posted on
01/09/2008 1:15:02 PM PST by
pissant
(Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
To: pissant
Perhaps, although Fred has delegates, so only Paul and Rudy would be left out. But they didn't simply make it one criteria. They made it one of two. Either A or B, neither of which seems irrational or arbitrary, and both of which, I believe, have been used in the past to pare down debate rosters. Hunter met neither, unfortunately.
142 posted on
01/09/2008 1:18:38 PM PST by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: pissant
By the way, I sincerely wish you and the others luck in getting him reinstated onto the debate roster. That sort of grassroots thing would be helpful, to say the least.
144 posted on
01/09/2008 1:19:36 PM PST by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson