To: junta
“other candidates” didn’t throw Duke out, we the people threw Duke out. As I recall, the other candidates ignored Duke, and rightly so, he wasn’t worth their time.
To: mnehrling
Candidates are supposed to ignore the racism and anti-semetism of another candidate?
207 posted on
01/09/2008 12:10:17 PM PST by
junta
(It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
To: mnehrling
“other candidates” didn’t throw Duke out, we the people threw Duke out. As I recall, the other candidates ignored Duke, and rightly so, he wasn’t worth their time. Not really. Reagan, Bush I and Atwater were vocal in their denunciation. You can't "actually throw someone out" of the party, Duke or Paul, but they ran a second Republican candidate against him. The runoff Duke won was Rep vs Rep. GWB campaigned for John Treen, the other Republican. Might have been his political campaign experience.
227 posted on
01/09/2008 12:35:36 PM PST by
SJackson
(If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
To: mnehrling; junta
“other candidates” didn’t throw Duke out, we the people threw Duke out. As I recall, the other candidates ignored Duke, and rightly so, he wasn’t worth their time. Duke still ran as a Republican when Livingston resigned and garnered 19% of the vote.
334 posted on
01/09/2008 2:31:12 PM PST by
fortheDeclaration
(The power under the Constitution will always be in the people- George Washington)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson