Replies

Interesting ....

Also voting in favour of Clarence Thomas:
Breaux (D-LA)
Robb (D-VA) (Puke)
DeConcini (D-AZ) (Gun-grabber extraordinaire ...)
Hollings (D-SC)

Also voting in favour of Samuel Alito:
Byrd (D-WV) (OMG! The Grand Wizard voted for him!)
Other than that, BTW, it was pretty much a party line vote.

Supporters of John Robers included:
Byrd (D-WV) (KKK Byrd again ...)
Leahy (D-VT) (Leaky Leahy??)
Levin (D-MI) (Carl Lenin???)
Rockefeller (D-WV)

Well, now ... What a thoroughgoing rogues’ gallery. What was that about blind pigs, again?

Do you honestly believe that Rudy McRomnabee would nominate the likes of Thomas, Alito, Roberts, or Scalia?

I don’t. Even GWB was off base, once ... do you remember Harriet Miers? I think he saw the conservative reaction to that brain fart, remembered what happened to Dear Old Dad, and read our lips.

The point is that without the votes of these RINOs we would have neither Alito nor Thomas sitting on the Supreme Court. This means that they are preferable to Democrats, who cannot be counted on to vote for any constructionist at any time.

The RINOs stood on principle in these votes. Some of them were castigated mightily for their votes by their constituents.

The Democrats who voted for these justices did so because they stuck their fingers into the wind, took polls and reacted to phone calls.

This is further evidence of the importance of voting Republican at all costs in November.

Make haste from Rio Linda.