“LOL, as soon as I read your response, I thought “I’ll be some yahoo will try to make the “self-organisation” argument, and sure enough, in the very next post, GITP did just that. Sure. Like convection currents prove that stereospecific self-organisation happened. Next, please.”
When I posted it, I thought, well, some hayseed yay-hoo will dismiss it out of hand with a ridiculous comment, but maybe someone else with the capability to, will actually learn something from the exchange.
There are a lot of examples beyond convection currents - you didn’t disappoint me by picking that one though. I expected as much.
The reason I picked that one is because it so easily demonstrates the ridiculousness of the whole premise. As far as dismissing self-organisation out of hand - not so. I dismiss it because it is unconvincing, science-wise. It is an example of “science by wishful thinking”. Somebody thinks self-organisation will surmount the grave problems with purely naturalistic origins, therefore that MUST be the answer to our scientific conundrum.