Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
Because natural causes follow natural laws and can explain things we need to know- but this in no way automatically rules out a Creative Designer, infact, the natural laws and the complexities that accompany naturalk laws and which defy natural causations point to a creative causation time and time again. There are things, systems, which do defy natural causations, and which naturalistic explanations come up short in answering.

No one can argue that natural causes rule out designers, but I'd like to see an example of a phenomenon that "defies" natural explanation, as opposed to simply being unexplained.

Let's have a little review of science history: Prior to Newton, did the planets require angels to push them around? Prior to Einstein, were angels required to explain the orbit of Mercury? Prior to the Grand Unification, are angels required to explain quantum gravity?

Give me a specific example of an event postulated by the theory of intelligent design that was caused by a designer. When did it happen? What happened?

110 posted on 01/09/2008 12:59:01 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

[[No one can argue that natural causes rule out designers, but I’d like to see an example of a phenomenon that “defies” natural explanation, as opposed to simply being unexplained.]]

Ah- but htey are not unexplained- you just don’t- won’t accept the explanation

[[Let’s have a little review of science history: Prior to Newton, did the planets require angels to push them around? Prior to Einstein, were angels required to explain the orbit of Mercury? Prior to the Grand Unification, are angels required to explain quantum gravity?]]

What relevence does anything ‘prior’ have to the conversation? eitehr, based on our present knowledge, thigns are designed or they are not- no credible scientist is going to state there is no design- the debate is over whether or not that design is able to occure natrually. So far, there is no evidence, despite much research to prove so, that nature is capable of producing irreducibly complex systems. Using logic, when design is discovered, one can come to a very reasonable and scientific conclusion, that a designer was the causation. To suggest everythign must have a nturalistic cause is a non objective form of science practice- nay- it’s a religious beleif itself.


116 posted on 01/09/2008 1:14:29 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson