Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

How much money has Romney spent on eacy vote he’s gotten so far? I have a REAL PROBLEM with rich guys trying to BUY a public office.....


219 posted on 01/08/2008 6:23:24 PM PST by Robbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]


To: Robbin

I thought I heard he spent 5 or 6 million on adds in NH.


223 posted on 01/08/2008 6:25:20 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
At least Mitt is spending his own money. God love him for that. (Fred too, to a large degree).

Note that Huck and McCain have spent (in essence) taxpayer dollars that they used via their time in office which has increased their more recent visibility. Everybody, in one way or another "buys" votes. Certainly Bush did when he raised more money than any other candidate in history, and I'm glad he did.

258 posted on 01/08/2008 6:39:24 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

To: Robbin
In Iowa, Mitt spent $250 to Hucks $10. 25 to one, and still lost.

McCain is/was broke, but is running on a shoestring. I bet the margin was just as large.

So, just to thought experiment this, Mitt would have to bump up to say 30 to one, to beat someone.

Mitt’s, sort of close, finishes are way way worse than they seem because his money is pulling for him, more than he himself.

I’m sure that Mitt is going to have to break records for spending, by far, to stay competitive. For example, say he spent 10 million in Iowa, and 6 in New Hampshire, and he still lost. This raises the question of what he would have to spend in New York. $20 million? And, he will, as I predicted in New Hampshire, lose to Rudy. Then there is California and Florida. Say together 30 plus million. Maybe 40. Texas? The rest of the US?

Mitt could be needing $100 mil to have a chance, maybe double to win by cash alone.

All of Mitt’s life he has been a good calculator. He’s never once shown a go for broke action. If he doesn’t see the pay off, soon, of being the biggest spender, by factors, and still losing, he’ll cut back.

Even a blind squirrel figures out he can’t get the acorn.

266 posted on 01/08/2008 6:42:26 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson