I just want you guys to define to me just what violence is acceptable in campaigns. I want the rules laid out. Just in case I choose to play that game.
Look it wouldn't bother me in the least to start seeing congresscritters and senators start slugging it out for a change. Hannity played a dangerous game with his audience attacking a legitimate candidate while treating others with respect. Hannity threw the first punches in this fight several debates ago. He's the Conservative version of Rivero. I stopped watch his TV show entirely because of it. He verbally attacked Ron Paul and would not so much as allow the man a rebuttal time.
I disagree with Ron Paul on National Defense which includes some M.E. policy. I think our M.E. policy is a disaster. It has been such since Jerry Ford told the Hitlers of the M.E. we will not harm you.
For re-building our military I support Hunter. I want to see our active duty End Troop Strengths, as well as ground, sea, and air defense programs restore to a two thirds of 1988 level. Now do I sound like a die hard no matter what he says Ron Paul supporter? Hunter is the only one who would do that and likely in time restore a 24/7/365 two carrier group presence in the MED SEA Basin.
However at the same time Ron Paul is right. Our M.E. policies have brought us grief. Now pay attention to what can happen. Reagan sat silent while Israel launched an attack that ended Saddams nuclear program. Today if Israel so much as looks cross-eyed at her enemies who do terrorist attacks on them in flies Condi to say No No. If the U.S. could learn to stay out of some nations internal business namely Israels maybe some of the M.E. trash could be taken out perhaps.