Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mbraynard
You know - I'd just presume that he deceived the MA voters when he was running because that was what it took to get a pro-lifer elected Governor. I really have no problem with tht.

But then he took the action of signing a health care plan which provided $50 abortions, even when he vetoed other parts of the bill. Doesn't sound very pro life to me.

158 posted on 01/07/2008 12:51:44 PM PST by Texas Federalist (Fred Thompson - The only true conservative in the race)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Federalist
But then he took the action of signing a health care plan which provided $50 abortions, even when he vetoed other parts of the bill. Doesn't sound very pro life to me.

That is such an old, old lie.

It wasn't part of any plan. It was a mandate from the state supreme court ruled the state constitution required abortion subsidies as part of Medicare going back to 1983. Romney's plan changed the way that medicare was structured, and also introduced a plan for those who were not on medicare but otherwise uncovered. However, he was powerless to change this.

So either I clearified something for you or you know better and are just trying to sabotage Mitt with falshoods. I'll presume the former.

167 posted on 01/07/2008 3:28:49 PM PST by mbraynard (Tagline changed due to admin request)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson