Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HonestConservative
It's not simply a "pay as you go" system. You MUST have insurance or you will be fined.

Massachusetts residents who remain uninsured in 2008 will begin facing monthly fines based on their age and income, according to new regulations unveiled by the Department of Revenue on Monday.

Here are how much different people may have to pay:

— The highest fines are leveled at those earning three times the annual federal poverty level, or $30,636 for an individual. Individuals aged 27 or older who are over that income threshold will pay the top fine of $76 a month, or $912 a year.

— Married couples earning more than $41,076 would each have to pay the top fine for a combined penalty of $1,824 if they are both uninsured for the entire year.

— Those aged 18-26 earning more than $30,636 will pay $56 a month or $672 a year.

— Individuals earning between $20,425 and $25,536 face a $420 fine for the year. Those earning between $15,325 and $20,424 face a $210 fine.

— There are no fines for individuals earning less than $15,325.

Penalties for not obtaining health care in 2008 [Happy New Year from ROMNEYCARE]

This is a government MANDATED program. You have absolutely no choice about participation. I don't have healthcare and I DO pay as I go. I've been fortunate not to have extremely high healthcare needs but right now, I can't afford $400 - $500 a month for insurance.

1,600 posted on 01/06/2008 6:34:12 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1520 | View Replies ]


To: 2nd amendment mama

I thought Fred did better than what these guys are saying.


1,637 posted on 01/06/2008 6:35:57 PM PST by citizen (Better Romney than McLame. Any day of the week.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama; Jim Robinson

“Massachusetts residents who remain uninsured in 2008 will begin facing monthly fines based on their age and income, according to new regulations unveiled by the Department of Revenue on Monday.”

This is clearly wrong. I would not support that, anywhere anytime.

Too bad. I like my system, of course!


1,704 posted on 01/06/2008 6:39:43 PM PST by HonestConservative (Shut the Huck Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama

“— The highest fines are leveled at those earning three times the annual federal poverty level, or $30,636 for an individual. Individuals aged 27 or older who are over that income threshold will pay the top fine of $76 a month, or $912 a year. “

OMG, thanks for posting that! It’s complete bullshit. I chose not to have health care for a while because I just did not want or need it. And I make more than 100k per year. That is pure, disgusting socialism. Steal from me to give to others. As if I don’t get robbed every paycheck as it is.


1,824 posted on 01/06/2008 6:47:19 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies ]

To: 2nd amendment mama

Don’t support the fine thing at all.

However, if you pay as you go, can you afford to pay a cash catastrophe of a half million if you should have a devastating accident or sudden illness?

I hope you can.


1,825 posted on 01/06/2008 6:47:20 PM PST by HonestConservative (Shut the Huck Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1600 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson