I have said if we wanted a businessman in chief we would have Donald Trump
We need a Comander in Chief and Mitt doesn’t qualify.
If not Romney then who? I like Duncan Hunter a lot but he’s going nowhere. He has no money and hasn’t run a good campaign. If we nominate a buffoon like John McCain or Mike Huckabee then we are sure to lose to the Democrats. Is that what you want SoCalPol? Do you want another Clinton or worse Obama in the White House? We can’t afford that. No matter how bad you think Romney is, he is far superior to any of the 3 possible Democrats. SoCalPol, it’s people like you who get Democrats elected!
Neither does Huckabee. McCain makes me shudder on a variety of levels.
Thompson is the only sane choice.
(Hunter fans need not reply, I know you like your guy but he isn't going to make it)
Having seen him in operation here in MA, I have to agree with your characterization of Mitt.
We need a Comander in Chief and Mitt doesn’t qualify.
I picked Mitt and Obama to win their parties' respective nominations because they're both very telegenic. I'm pleasantly surprised that I was wrong, at least about Republican voters.
It looks like it's down to Huckabee and McCain. Not a fabulous choice. Still, I'm glad that Republicans have chose a "values" candidate as the front-runner. Too bad he's a big spender. But I prefer a big-spending pro-lifer to a pro-abortion economic conservative.
Life comes first.