Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG; Ol' Sparky
So you take Romney to task over issues where he is by far better than the other RINOs in the race. And what’s worse is that Romney is running on conservative agenda - Guiliani, Huckabee and McCain are not. All three are deliberately deviating from conservative orthodoxy.

You call the following a good representation of a "conservative" Romney campaign on what Pat Buchanan on the Laura Ingraham show this a.m. said was of importance to voters, especially Evangelical voters? (what Buchanan called the social/moral/cultural issues)

Huck was not my fave candidate, but on family issues, who emerges at the top for protecting marriage & marriage rights? (Huckabee & Hunter) Who emerges counterfeit marriage & domestic partnership benefits (Huckabee & Hunter & Paul) [In fact, Romney supports both civil unions for homosexuals & dp benefits as well]

Who opposed homosexual couples adopting children? (Huckabee & Hunter & Paul)

On cultural issues, who were the weakest 2 GOP candidates on a long list of homosexual issues? (Romney & Giuliani)

In comparing Huckabee to Romney, who was better on religious rights & healthcare issues (Huckabee on both counts)

The character of Mitt Romney is of higher calibre than Guiliani, Huckabee and McCain as well.

Oh yeah, Huck & McCain--both Baptists, BTW (even tho only Huck is recognized as one 'cause of his dozen yrs as a minister), took in $25,000 grand a year + stock for 10 years--part of which, as--not me--but as the LDS-owned Deseret News pointed out in July, 2007...came from revenues gleaned from in-room porn movies via the Marriott chain where Romney was a board member.

Huck, of course, is not squeaky clean, having accepted gifts in what I find was a "corrupt" manner when he left office, registering them under the "wedding" gifts category so that it was technically legal. (I think he should be held morally accountable for this as well)

269 posted on 01/04/2008 12:43:10 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian

Pro-homosexual NEA endorsed Huckabee. Thos litmus tests wont matter because Huckabee is all about nanny-statism in so many other areas, the liberals will be in 7th heaven.

It’s all about gays and not about how Huckster was ranked 45 out of 50 on fiscal responsibility scale ... getting an F from Cato? As long as he’s pro-life and anti-gay, he can be a tax-and-spend John Edwards and a Jimmy Carter on foreign policy?

CLUSTERHUCKED.


284 posted on 01/04/2008 1:00:38 PM PST by WOSG (Iowa gave us a CLUSTERHUCK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson