Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Milligan
Because Pakistan never been a really stable country since they broke away from India.

All the more reason why we shouldn't have stuck our noses in there to begin with. We didn't need to beg for Musharraf's permission or give him $10 billion to hunt down AQ near his border...we should have just fricking went in there.

173 posted on 01/01/2008 4:52:06 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (13-3 Green Bay Packers - The road to the Super Bowl begins NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Musharraf wasn’t in power in the 1990’s.
The Bhutto family was incharged.
How many times have the Bhutto family been charged with corruption and had to flee the country for their safety?

And guess who got the nuclear bomb during the 1990’s...the Bhutto family...all under the careful watch of “lets not get involved with foreign intanglements” Clinton.

Why didn’t the Clinton Administration tried to get some peace treaty going with India and Pakistan so we wouldn’t have the proliferation of Nuclear Weapons?

Life on this earth didn’t start on September 11, 2001!

Hey, I’m not going to blame the Clinton Administration on this.

Your looking at a country....like Pakistan...that is all FU.

Pakistan was not satisfied being separated from India in the late 1940’s. They’re too busy killing each other off within their own political intrique......so stop blaming the United States for every G@d damn thing that ever happens to a country that is totally unstable from the get go.


190 posted on 01/01/2008 5:41:06 PM PST by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson