[rideharddiefast]

People accusing Ron Paul of hating America, loving the terrorists, having a crappy foreign policy, etc, really don't understand or haven't read the US Constitution as practically everything Paul stands for or promotes is in line with the US Constitution.

What does understanding the constitution have to do with cut and run being anti-American or loving terrorists? He blames America for anything that goes wrong in the world. I feel that shows he is a blame America first promoter. How does that show I do not understand the US Constitution? The US Constitution is interpreted by the Supreme Court. The Constitution says that it is the Supreme Court that has the last say. A president nor anyone else has that say. If the war or anything else was unconstitutional it would be up to the Supreme Court to say so.

[xrp]

He blames America for anything that goes wrong in the world.

Ron Paul refers to 60-70 years worth of foreign policy, not say, just the last decade or two. How would you argue differently?

Would you say that current US foreign policy (nation building and bases/troops in dozens of foreign countries, CIA involvement since the 1950s in dozens of foreign nations) is in line with the US Constitution or out of line with the US Constitution?