Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Finny

Actually, my reason is if enough people start talking about it, then maybe it might get the attention it deserves, including from the candidate himself.

As far as suggesting a back-up candidate for if (and when?) the wheels come off the red pickup truck, I have come to the conclusion that McCain would be the best choice if Republicans want to win in Iraq — and in November. McCain’s promise to veto every piece of legislation sent to him that contains pork is very enticing. None of the other issues really matter if our elected leaders can’t even get this most basic (and most broken) function of government right.


140 posted on 12/27/2007 2:25:30 PM PST by counterpunch (ABH - Anybody But Huckabee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]


To: counterpunch

“I have come to the conclusion that McCain would be the best choice if Republicans want to win in Iraq”

McCain’s a panderer. Fred Thompson is a straight talker. What’s so hard about this?

Media types pushing McCain are only doing so because they are terrified that Thompson will win and actually do something to slow the onslaught of socialism. These media people can’t come out and say who they support and who they’re afraid of. They’re like liberals. Liberal women. I’m talking about Pat Buchanan, Brit Hume, Fred Barnes, Krauthammer, and the biggest woman of all, OReilly. Wimps? Sissies? Crybabies? There must be a better word to describe them.

And how about opening your eyes? We’re already winning in Iraq!


157 posted on 12/27/2007 4:02:51 PM PST by reasonisfaith (A liberal will never stand up like a man and admit his true beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson