Did I say that?
Posted on 12/26/2007 2:54:30 PM PST by Syncro
Her pick is Hunter.
you are an idiot, you support sodomy too ?
I'm guessing that I'm either too old or too young... which is it?
I’m thinking you’re probably too young to remember the decision.
They know they can’t beat a conservative.
Ahhh! The story of my life. Nobody tells me anything! :)
...So this little stretch-marked cornpone is either lying, has a closed head injury, is a complete ignoramus -- or all of the above.Yowsah!
See also, from plutarch01.wordpress.com:
...Between June 2003 to June 2004 Mike Huckabee lost 110 lbs., dropping from 290 to 180 lbs. He attributed his weight loss to diet and exercise. Based on the premise that “if I can lose weight, anyone can, Huckabee launched the Healthy Arkansas anti-obesity initiative and authored a “How I did it,” diet book. Huckabee embarked upon a public relations blitz, making “fitness and weight control his signature issue…, and never stray[ing] far from his own example. The name recognition that this PR effort gained (along with no longer being obese) elevated Huckabee’s long-shot candidacy from risible to somewhat plausible.It has been rumored that Huckabee’s weight loss was due not to diet and exercise but to gastric bypass (bariatric) surgery. This blog seeks to examine the evidence that is publicly available, to determine whether weight loss from diet/exercise or bariatric surgery is more likely...
-- snip --
...If Huckabee did have bariatric surgery, the secret will be unlikely to survive a general election campaign. Huckabee has made his weight loss not just a personal health matter, but a defining saga, a prominent part of his Presidential resume, the subject of a profitable (scam?) diet book, and a model for his public policy as Governor.
Its disclosure would be an admission of fraud and deceit that would be to Democrats an inestimable advantage...
Huckabee has surged because he won a couple of debates and he’s got evangelical support. If a quick rise can happen to the liberal pro-life evangelical Huckster, it can happen to the conservative pro-life evangelical Hunter.
.
.
.
.
According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts
Why the smart money is on Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1926032/posts
In this poll Hunter is up 3% and even with Paul and Thompson.
http://www.wxyz.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=3481ef60-8195-46a9-af04-b87b907bcfdd
Did you ever stop to think that it could be a result of her genes (i.e., a thyroid problem like I have)? Cruel, very cruel an childish.
She might be a pain to live with, but I think she'd be great at dinner and out on the town.
Yup, a thought that popped into my mind when the current Huck Shuck started.
pointing out that he is on record supporting the Supreme Court's sodomy-is-a-constitutional-right decision - Ann CoulterFrom the law school at Ann's alma mater:What Supreme Court case? Did this really happen or is Ann just making this up to prove a point? - John123
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
LAWRENCE et al. v. TEXAS
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT
No. 02—102. Argued March 26, 2003–Decided June 26, 2003
Responding to a reported weapons disturbance in a private residence, Houston police entered petitioner Lawrence’s apartment and saw him and another adult man, petitioner Garner, engaging in a private, consensual sexual act. Petitioners were arrested and convicted of deviate sexual intercourse in violation of a Texas statute forbidding two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct. In affirming, the State Court of Appeals held, inter alia, that the statute was not unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The court considered Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186, controlling on that point.
Held: The Texas statute making it a crime for two persons of the same sex to engage in certain intimate sexual conduct violates the Due Process Clause. Pp. 3—18.
Ann better stand in better with the the good Lord than her miniskirted pictures would suggest. Has she never heard of modesty? She writes about a “Godless” america but dresses like a prositute at times. Not exactly a “Godly” woman in her dress.
Whatever, IF (a big if) Mike gets the nomination, she is going to be eating a lot of crow. I’m curious how she is going to be able to mend fences. Rush has pointed out where he differs with Mike and has pretty much kept the “make fun” rhetoric to simply calling him “Huckster.”
Ann, on the other hand, is being downright vicious. I can’t really complain because I’m prone to have an acid tongue also. However, I don’t make my living by commentating. She could be mouthing herself out of business. Probably a remote possibility, but one none the less.
Some of the insults she flings at Mike are making her look like a psuedo-intellectual snob. Just like the university crowd she disdains.
Ann kicks butt bump!
I'll be looking for the Bible verses concerning just what constitutes "Godly" attire unless you can provide them here.
You know Miss Coulter, it would make you more believable if you would wear more clothing. You use sex to sale yourself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.