Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tompster76
You are 100% sure that AP/NYT story is the absolute fact.

Regarding the speeches/dates of MLK in 1963.....Yes. They had absolutely no reason to lie about where MLK appeared in 1963.

You are so desperate to believe "Myth" that anything contrary to your view is suspect and a plot to defame him. Get your head out of his butt long enough to breathe and wake up to the fact that he "stretched the truth"!

I know, the papers lied when they were covering MLK in the 60's just so supposed eyewitnesses could be defamed today....that's it....sure.

28 posted on 12/23/2007 3:40:51 PM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: 2nd amendment mama

“Yes. They had absolutely no reason to lie about where MLK appeared in 1963.”

There are other MSM references (dating back to 1960’s) conflicting NYT story and stating that MLK and Romney Sr marched together. They had no apparent reason to lie either. 2 independent black witnesses showed up contradicting NYT story. (And NYT would have every motive to lie, because MSM is attacking Romney every way they can).

As I said, I don’t what is the truth but I know that MLK and Romney planned to march together and several sources claim that it did happen. What I do know, is that DNC/Hillary is attacking Romney every way they can. Romney would get a lot of black votes against Hillary.


33 posted on 12/23/2007 3:52:07 PM PST by tompster76 (Amnesty: No aspirations of citizenship to illegals - ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson