Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stoat

Based on the facts in the article, a clear case of self-defense. A person has an inalienable right to keep and bear arms, and to use arms in defense of his self, his family and his property (all of which apply here.) Any local law requiring otherwise is Unconstitutional. No policeman, or other government official, can logically have greater right to use deadly force in self defense than any common person, since all government power derives solely from the people themselves. A policeman cannot obtain rights from the people, unless the people already have those rights as individuals.


18 posted on 12/22/2007 11:28:16 PM PST by sourcery (If Hillary is the next President, she may also be the last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

He was only faced with a threat to his life because he needlessly escalated the situation.
The cops could have come and diffused the situation, as they frequently do.
He had an easy opportunity to diffuse the situation and prevent it from escalating, which he chose not to do. He chose to roll the dice and handle it himself, and this time the roll didn’t come up in his favor.


20 posted on 12/22/2007 11:32:08 PM PST by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery

I’m sorry, but you are legally 100% wrong.

Mr. White, as much as a feel for him and his intent to protect his son, was the instigator of the deadly interaction.

See # 17 above.

TX and NY law VERY different.


29 posted on 12/22/2007 11:42:11 PM PST by MindBender26 (Is FR worth our time anymore? All the "fun" sees to be gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson