That's what I thought. And no one's denying that the Romneys were involved in the civil rights movement. What's at issue is why Mitt feels the need to embellish their role, and what that reveals about his character.
Right, in a nut shell that is it. We don’t deny George was involved with the civil rights movement. We just don’t think the newspapers are lying when they originally reported the two didn’t march together. But they both did march but on different days. Thus Mitt never saw his father march with King and he surely didn’t march with his father and King like he said in a 78 interview.