Posted on 12/22/2007 7:04:49 AM PST by Leisler
You don’t contradict what I wrote, merely leave out part of it. What is it with you Mitt-hating-half-truthers?
Yes, MLK was at the June 23rd march. Accounts are divided as to whether Romney was. Romney definitely was at the June 29th march, accounts are divided over whether MLK was. That Romney supported MLK is beyond question. The eyewitnesses who place both men at the June 29th march carry more weight than the Grosse Pointe Historical Society dames who say only Romney was there. But either way, your dogmatic pronouncement exceeds what the evidence can support. Try to get it straight next time when you use a huge Font to condemn someone.
It certainly would have been the real story, if not for Mitt's odd compulsion to exaggerate the details.
Remind me again how this is any different from a Kerry supporter claiming the "real story" is that Kerry was a Vietnam vet - forget what the swiftboat vets are saying.
You’ve really hurt me. (Not)
You could say the George Romney was at the founding of the destruction of black America.
That’s just vile.
Mitt nor any other Republican in the foreseeable future will get more than 7%-12% of the black vote.
FRegards,
H-T
Now the truth comes out that George Romney really DID march with MLK in Grosse Pointe, with actual participants of the march giving their statements to the press and demanding apologies from those pundits who said it didn’t happen.
Now what then? It turns out Mitt Romney did NOT lie about that. However, he was loose with his words when he said he “saw” them march together, claiming he was speaking figuratively.
What exactly have Americans become when a particular politician needs to watch his every word to make sure nothing he says can ever come back to haunt him?
Which American politician has NEVER lied or stretched the truth or spoken figuratively? If ALL of them do it (for example, did Mike Huckabee REALLY stayed at the “Holiday Inn Express” that night?) why gang up on Romney for acting like all politicians?
Could it be because Americans hold him to a higher standard than all other politicians? If so, why?
It’s a good question to ask.
Could you link to them? I've seen this cited, but not seen the photos.
Yes, it saddens be greatly that we live in an age in which so many conceal their true motives with hypocracy and disengenuousness.
Those who prefer Thompson, Rudy, Huckabee or whomever, jump on any slam against Mitt just to help being him down.
This is a new form of PC cowardice.
See 107 above
You know how I can tell when Mitt is lying?
.....
.....
His mouth is moving....badda bing badda boom!
Man, these Romney threads are absolutely hysterical! lol
LOL...yep, that proves it!
There is a photo of the two. But it doesn’t put George with MLK on the June 23rd Freedom March because he wasn’t there.
And sad all at the same time.....
Wow, two separate arguments against the Romneys:
1. Mitt lied about his father marching with MLK - but now witnesses have turned up declaring they marched with them, the argument now becomes ...
2. It’s George Romney’s fault for marching with blacks for civil rights because most blacks are now Democrats and the welfare state is wrong.
Nice ...
That's what I thought. And no one's denying that the Romneys were involved in the civil rights movement. What's at issue is why Mitt feels the need to embellish their role, and what that reveals about his character.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.