Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke; RedRover
"‘why did you allege a government conspiracy at Pearl Harbor’?"

Actually, RedRover first implied that we Paulnuts would start wearing t-shirts thus:

"Oh, my gosh. What’s next for Paulnuts? “Pearl Harbor was an inside job” t-shirts?"(RedRover, post #515)

And is RedRover dismayed that you don't read his posts?

And just to clear up one point; IMO, one should not call that conspiracy a "government" conspiracy simply because the POTUS (FDR) was part of it.

568 posted on 12/26/2007 8:01:36 AM PST by Designer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies ]


To: Designer

In post #560, I asked you: ‘why did you allege a government conspiracy at Pearl Harbor’?

You responded in #568: “Actually, RedRover first implied that we Paulnuts would start wearing t-shirts thus:””Oh, my gosh. What’s next for Paulnuts? “Pearl Harbor was an inside job” t-shirts?”(RedRover, post #515)”

You need to go back and read the thread starting in #487 where you said: “...FDR had foreknowledge of the Japanese attack, but chose to allow the fleet to take the hit.”

Since your post #487 preceeded RedRover’s post #515, you can’t blame him.

Now, would you care to answer the question I asked in # post #560: ‘why did you allege a government conspiracy at Pearl Harbor’?

Or, perhaps, you can find an earlier reference to a government conspiracy at Pearl Harbor?

Also,

I asked you in #472: “BTW, if Afghanistan was Constitutional, why wasn’t Iraq?”

You responded in #490: “Our action was not against the government of Afghanistan, but rather against the Taliban, and we went in with the help and cooperation of the afghan government.”

I asked in response in #517: “Can you provide one credible source that supports your allegation that we had ‘help and cooperation of the afghan government’ or that the Taliban was not in control of Afghanistan?”

I still haven’t seen an answer.


569 posted on 12/26/2007 8:49:27 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies ]

To: Designer

I have another question for you.

Do you agree with Ron Paul that Abe Lincoln started the civil war in order to “get rid of the original intent of the republic...”

Here’s the quote from the transcript.

Ron Paul said: “Absolutely. Six hundred thousand Americans died in a senseless civil war. No, he shouldn’t have gone, gone to war. He did this just to enhance and get rid of the original intent of the republic. I mean, it was the—that iron, iron fist..”


579 posted on 12/26/2007 10:01:07 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Ron Paul - building a bridge to the 19th century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson