[1L]

>>but looking to “printing errors” in the 4th Century (1000 years before printing!) to explain what you want to swallow<<

The printing errors were in the FOURTEENTH century, not the 4th century.

What else did you miss in the article that lead you to criticize it?

[hunter112]

Ah, you're right, I got 4 B.C. confused with 14h Century. Guess that should teach me to drink India Pale Ale while posting, but I doubt it...

In any case, my point is still valid, a lot of what people think they know about the nativity is just pap fed to them by marketers and media.