Yup, today they went down substantially, I’m guessing due to the fact that Tancredo didn’t endorse Hunter.
Romney is about to overtake Giuliani for the Nom contract, which makes me feel just fine that Rudy is going down.
President.Field continues to move in high volume and Hunter’s volume is high, presumably because it’s a bargain.
Maybe Hunter is down 96% from its peak, but your guy is the ony GOP candidate to squander a 30 point lead.
Glad to see you consider this data to be trustworthy enough to quote it.
And, since you have called me a troll for logging onto ‘Pro Thompson’ threads and supporting my candidate with facts & analysis, it’s time to return the favor, TROLL.
.
.
.
According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts
Nope. I clearly said that I cited it because YOU consider it so important.
...your guy is the ony GOP candidate to squander a 30 point lead.
Your "analysis" of the Dec 12 debate was that percentage change was important. Now that your guy has lost 96%, you want to go back to actual losses. Fine.
I'll point out again that Hunter Duncan never had a "30-point lead" to lose. He never had even had a 3-point lead, or any lead at all.
He's just raising a war chest for his son's congressional run. His whole vanity campaign seems to be a fundraising farce.
Good luck with that.