Statistics is a science. That is reality.
The stuff you post is garbage, completely unburdened by reality or intelligent application of science.
Then why didn’t you refute it when it spit out the Huckster as the winner of previous debates? After all, since Hunter is my candidate and I’ve posting the Huckster as the winner by my objective analysis, that proves I proceeded from an unbiased perspective. The reason: Because it was factually based and objective in approach — that is, until it spits out Hunter as the winner, then you have a problem with it. Just like you don’t have a problem with how Intrade showed your guy in the lead, so Intrade was good; but when Intrade showed your guy losing 30 points, Intrade is unreliable according to you. What a bunch of hogwash.
The only thing you’ve EVER done is portray your guy in a subjectivist positive mode. And you call other freepers liars over the most miniscule details, so there’s no good reason to listen to you.
Good luck with your candidate.
.
.
.
According to Intrade, the winner of the December 12th GOP debate was... Duncan Hunter.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1938773/posts