That way the costs can be kept way down.
You may be right about him not knowing about the appearance of a “cross-like” image BEFORE the ad aired. But you must admit that AFTER he saw the ad himself and saw the obvious imagery, his response to the accusations was pretty lame and far-fetched. The appearance of the cross is pretty obvious (at least, to me).
My point is....what we need most in a candidate right now is elect-a-bility. Huck’s already got the hard-left anti-Christians (which is most Democrat supporters) against him due to the mere fact that he IS a Christian. Now, with his response to this ad, he’s turned a good number of Christians/conservatives against him as well. They just don’t feel they can trust him any more.
All I’m saying is.....his response to the accusations re: his ad was not very bright. That alone may not make him unelectable. But there are other issues or negatives re: Huck’s policies that could. He really should have (and could have) handled this much better.