Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest

Of course he’s taking everything very seriously sitetest. He’s running a presidential campaign. He’s talking with the NY Times, so what? I don’t care for this politics of personal destruction, and that’s what this is. I don’t care who the candidate is.


217 posted on 12/20/2007 1:52:41 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: Norman Bates
Dear Norman Bates,

“Of course he’s taking everything very seriously sitetest.”

One doesn’t hire one of the very top criminal defense lawyers in the nation if it’s all smoke and no fire.

“He’s talking with the NY Times, so what?”

Then why lie about it? Here’s a piece from the Breitbart on-line article that I cited previously:


“McCain acknowledged that his presidential campaign aides have had discussions with the newspaper regarding its inquiries.

“’I have not been in talks with The New York Times. They’ve been communicating with our staff and with us,’ McCain said.”


Here’s a bit from politico.com:

“But, McCain said, ‘I have not been in talks with The New York Times.’

“However, Politico has confirmed that McCain himself had one conversation with Times Executive Editor Bill Keller, in which the senator urged him not to go with the story.”


If there’s smoke but no fire, why lie?

Perhaps Mr. McCain has shown us that he’s just insane, and not guilty, by way of a wild overreaction. Or, perhaps he’s guilty of something serious enough to warrant the services of Mr. Bennett.

Only time will tell.


sitetest

221 posted on 12/20/2007 2:03:35 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson