To: Texaggie79
Im tellin ya, with all the people coming out of the woodwork to libel Dr. Paul, Im just about ready to support the man. Joking or not, that is the reason I started to pay attention to him and decided to support him. Made me want to read about him and I liked what I read.
Duncan Hunter, Thompson and Tancredo seemed like good guys too and had I not decided on Paul, one of them would have gotten my support.
I have not read or heard about it, but I guess Tancredo stepped out today. Good luck to him, very strong on immigration.
59 posted on
12/20/2007 6:40:32 AM PST by
rineaux
(How dare you, how dare you question the Clinton's wrecked record.)
To: rineaux
I have not read or heard about it, but I guess Tancredo stepped out today. Good luck to him, very strong on immigration.
Tom is gone already? Too bad really. I've always liked him. He led on the borders issue back when it was very very unpopular to speak out. And no one can ever take away Duncan's leadership on the fence in 2006. As bad as 2006 was, without Duncan's fence bill, it would have been a total GOP bloodbath.
OTOH, word is out that the Tancredo folk in NH will come over to the Paul campaign en masse. It's been a settled matter for some time now. I could easily see Tancredo or Hunter tapped for jobs like DHS or SecDef in a Paul administration.
67 posted on
12/20/2007 7:30:00 AM PST by
George W. Bush
(Apres moi, le deluge.)
To: rineaux
“Duncan Hunter, Thompson and Tancredo seemed like good guys too and had I not decided on Paul, one of them would have gotten my support.”
So what you are saying is that you only go for candidates that clearly from Day One have no chance in hell of winning?
267 posted on
12/23/2007 11:23:51 AM PST by
Bogtrotter52
(Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson