Posted on 12/19/2007 5:40:50 PM PST by kc8ukw
In addition to raising auto fuel efficiency standards 40 percent, an energy bill passed by Congress yesterday bans the incandescent light bulb by 2014.
President Bush signed the 822-page measure into law today after it was sent up Pennsylvania Avenue in a Toyota Prius hybrid vehicle. The House passed the bill by a 314-100 vote after approval by the Senate last week.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
I’m still wondering about the UV rays emitted. On GE’s website, they assure prospective buyers that,
“regular fluorescent bulbs used in your home or office do not produce a hazardous amount of UV. Most light sources, including fluorescent bulbs, emit a small amount of UV, but the UV produced by fluorescent light bulbs is far less than the amount produced by natural daylight.”
Excuse me while I don’t trust my genetic and ocular health to the GE marketing department, but I’m not so sure that 40 years of many hours a day of exposure won’t cause problems.
What if I accidentally break a fluorescent bulb in my home?
The most important thing to remember is to never use a vacuum . A standard vacuum will spread mercury containing dust throughout the area as well as potentially contaminating the vacuum. What you should do is:
The next time you replace a bulb, consider putting a drop cloth on the floor so that any accidental breakage can be easily cleaned up.
A false inference, it would appear! Note that this could only apply to the hoarding of "certain excluded bulb types". So the clause is aimed at a post-ban shift in buying habits. The common light-bulb will not be available for purchase in this regime.
On my list of things to do:
buy a ton of 40w bulbs.
I’m thinkin’ that I’m going to buy the store blind.
Yep, I’m talkin’ ‘bout those fixtures having multiple sockets. I can’t tell you how long there’s been a mere 60w bulb in one of three sockets.
In fact: I’ll buy the store stupid of all its 20w bulbs.
You’ll see...
Me too. I despise the light they produce, and hate to read by fluorecent lights. I can live with halogen. Once again, I can't believe how we are FORCED to obey.
Right, but they just evacuated a school and sent in a hazmat team because some science lab broke a mercury thermometer.
I've got a Toto and I love it.
http://terrylove.com/crtoilet.htm
PLEASE post tha on ALL eco-geek threads! That is so freaking STUPID! Send to your Congressman also.
Good Grief!! Ron Paul is CRAZY...and has NO Humor in him.
My father bought one of the new compact lights more than 10 years ago. It's still working.
BTW, I have one of the original GE commercially viable fluorescent light fixtures (circa 1938/39) used by my grandfather. They still produce bulbs that fit in it.
No doubt Congress means well, but they are all a bunch of ignorant hillbillies ~ the best new thing coming along is the Light Emitting Diode lamp.
If Congress-critters actually cared they'd taken that $40 billion in earmarks for horsestalls and butterfly footpeddle park boats and dropped it on some happy camper for the purpose of actualizing an inexpensive LED spotlight!
You sure won't. :-(
ff
Around my house switching to the new bulbs has saved enough electricity that we offset the costs of heating water. For those who don’t bathe thee will, of course, be no such offset.
Avoid the electronic bells and whistles and you'll do just fine.
My sister in law bought one of the top end machines. It's virtually silent and has violet and purple glowing lights with a full electronic display system.
It was annoying to watch ~ like a really bad lead-in to a sci-fi cartoon.
“But will they be any good in light fixtures that only accept 60 watts? because the next step is already in the process - mandating light fixtures/lamps that can only take up to 60 watts”
What business is it of the government how much light we wish to use in our own homes? We’re PAYING the electric bill, aren’t we? What’s next? Outlaw ovens and mandate microwaves? Jigger cars so that they’ll turn off if some government prick thinks we’re driving too far? Or just outlaw our cars entirely if they’re too old to be “environmentally friendly”?
I am angrier about this than I was about the immigration bill, and I guess at the root of that is the feeling that MY side... excuse me, OUR side... you know, the side that’s supposed to be standing up for Truth, Justice and the American way is just as bad as those demented, evil cretins on the RAT side.
And, yes, I DO blame George W. Bush. And yes, he didn’t write the bill. But he did sign it. And I don’t care if it DOES fund the war. In fact, if it was a choice between taking away our right to have light bulbs (I can’t even believe I’m TYPING that!) and taking away the war funding - I’d choose to take away the war funding in a heartbeat. Then make a speech and explain to the American public WHY, and have congress re-write a bill that didn’t invade our homes and tell us what products we could or could not buy in the name of some environmental insanity. But Bush, as with the “campaign finance bill”, took the easy way out, and decided that screwing America was the easier course of action.
We use led bulbs for the tree now. They’re actually quite nice.
The absolute lowest price front-loader I found when we were washer shopping back Thanksgiving week was at Lowes - it was for a Fisher & Paykel front-loader. It was (and still is) $599. My concern - according the salesman who actually was pushing that washer, is that it can take 3-4 weeks for repairs because they have to order the parts - from overseas....
Our neighbor has high-end Whirlpool front load washer and dryer - and the washer went out last year. It took over 6 weeks for the parts to come in for the warranty repair to be done...
I dunno - if I spend $1200-1400 for a washer, not only do I expect not to need warranty work to begin with, but if I do - I certainly don’t expect it to take more than a few days.
All that being said - I would actually like a front-loader. They use less water, and from what I have seen - actually do a better job of cleaning clothes.
truman left office with a 22% approval rating and is now considered one of our most effective presidents. i don’t really care what bush’s ratings are as most americans don’t. we elect a president to make tough choices that in many cases the majority of us differ with. too bad. good luck running a country on polls.
GOD BLESS GW BUSH. I don’t doubt in 10 years he will be judged a good to great president...despite your feelings.
truman left office with a 22% approval rating and is now considered one of our most effective presidents. i dont really care what bushs ratings are as most americans dont. we elect a president to make tough choices that in many cases the majority of us differ with. too bad. good luck running a country on polls.
GOD BLESS GW BUSH. I dont doubt in 10 years he will be judged a good to great president...despite your feelings
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.