To: purpleraine
It’s reprehensible and anyone who votes against a candidate on this basis is a fanatic.
Wrong answer again. This is America, where we have the right to vote or not vote for anyone we darned well please and not be questioned about it.
22 posted on
12/19/2007 12:26:16 PM PST by
JamesP81
("I am against "zero tolerance" policies. It is a crutch for idiots." --FReeper Tenacious 1)
To: JamesP81; purpleraine
Wrong answer again. This is America, where we have the right to vote or not vote for anyone we darned well please and not be questioned about it.I do believe that was the point the poster was making. Glade you agreed with him.
30 posted on
12/19/2007 12:30:57 PM PST by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: JamesP81
I see. You can darned well question someones religion and its appropiateness for a candidate. However we are not darned well pleased to question your questions and their appropiateness for voting for a candidate.
If it is good for the goose, it is good for the gander.
To: JamesP81
Does that mean you don’t agree witrh these little religious tests we see almost every day or do you only vote for certain religions?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson