Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nesnah
So, I guess one the three witnesses (David Whitmer) is a liar:

“Joseph would put the seer stone into a hat and put his face in the hat, drawing it closely around his face to exclude the light; and in the darkness the spiritual light would shine. A piece of something resembling parchment would appear, and on that appeared the writing. One character at a time would appear, and under it was the translation in English. Brother Joseph would read off the English to O. Cowdery, who was his principal scribe, and when it was written down and repeated to brother Joseph to see if it were correct, then it would disappear and another character with the interpretation would appear.” - David Whitmer

+++++++++++++++++

not what I said, I said you changed the wording just to make it a lie.

148 posted on 12/20/2007 9:58:28 AM PST by fproy2222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: fproy2222

Um, no, the wording is just as it came from Whitmer himself. If the truth is too tough for you to grapple with, you should head somewhere that fantasies will not be challenged and you can live in blissful ignorance.

The ‘translation’ procedure described by Whitmer is accurate, in his own words, and quite believable when you consider Joseph Smith’s earlier, pre-Golden Bible days of money-digging using a seer stone in his hat. That is all documented and not up for dispute.


149 posted on 12/20/2007 10:36:31 AM PST by nesnah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson