Straight Answers to Fox’s 21 Questions about the Mormon Church

Parchment and Pen ^ | Rob Bowman

[Gamecock]

This seems to be a reasonable response to the companion article.

[org.whodat]

Just about as important as asking a person if they scratch their ass with their left hand are right hand.

[RDTF]

so they believe Jesus discovered America??

[Gamecock]

Your tagline?

[scripter]

Read later.

[purpleraine]

Reprehensible, another thread aimed at smearing a candidate because of his religion.

[i_dont_chat]

I’m interested in the Mormon’s belief that a person, even after he/she is deceased, can be prayed into Heaven.

And is this why the Church of LDS in Salt Lake City, Utah, has such a large collection of genealogy records — for the purpose of being able to identify their ancestors and pray them into heaven?

And how much money does this process cost, i.e., the praying a dead ancestor into heaven?

[Gamecock]

Awesome tagline.

[Excellence]

Q: Is there such a thing as Mormon “underwear”? if so, are all Mormons required to wear it? What does it symbolize?

If a Mormon wears it, Dressed in White sells it.

https://www.dressedinwhite.com/www/home.do

[Zakeet]

While you're answering Fox's 21 questions, I would like to know:

The LDS Church has made thousands of CHANGES to the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants; and

Even after all of those changes, hundreds of obvious ERRORS still remain; and

Even after all of those changes, there are still many serious CONTRADICTIONS in Mormon Scripture.

In light of these facts: How can someone know the Standard Works are true and Joseph Smith was not a false prophet?

I have asked this question many times in the past and I have yet to receive a reasoned response.

Perhaps you can help me ... or perhaps somebody else can ... maybe today ... on this thread ...

[viper592]

If one’s Ontology and Epistemology are in error in their roots, you can expect greater problems to arise down the line.

That is why this is important.

[Gamecock]

Reprehensible, another thread aimed at smearing a candidate because of his religion.

No, addressing the misinfo put out by a religion in America.

[evets]

To 'Kolob' and beyond!

[purpleraine]

All of these articles on the candidate’s religions amounts to whose God is better. It’s reprehensible and anyone who votes against a candidate on this basis is a fanatic.

[Old Professer]

Sounds like they put cherries on cheesecake.

[org.whodat]

I have a much greater interest in someone, because of their religion, wanting to cut my head off? Has any Mormon said they wanted to do that??

[org.whodat]

All of these articles on the candidate’s religions amounts to whose God is better. It’s reprehensible and anyone who votes against a candidate on this basis is a fanatic.

Agreed, but I don't know about those snake handling people?

[Gamecock]

It’s reprehensible and anyone who votes against a candidate on this basis is a fanatic.

Will you vote for Romney? Did you know he supported Planned Parenthood?

I don't care one iota what a candidate's religion is. What I do want is an honest explanation of that religion. Don't think that is important? What would prevent us from electing a kool-aid pushing candidate?

BTW, are you Mormon? Is that the real issue here?

(For the record, I don't like Huckabee, in spite of his being a SBC preacher)

[JamesP81]

Reprehensible, another thread aimed at smearing a candidate because of his religion.

Sorry, used to be a Mormon. This article is mostly accurate. Leaving out the political side of it, there is very little here I would argue with.

One of the reasons I left the LDS after I got saved was that I came to the conclusion that it was not biblical that a man could become a god in time.