You flatly brought the question of OBL's "responsibility" for 9/11. The implication, of course, is that "others" were responsible.
Now you state: "I’m sure OBL had underlings (soldiers) and such at his disposal. Would you at least agree with that? Do you really think OBL did this all by himself?
Of course not. OBL did not act alone. The 19 hijackers, as well as others within his organization is testament to that. But this in no way removes him from responsibility.
Do you think that there is a human being alive today...let’s just use our own military as an example...ok?....who could come up with a plan....do all the recon needed, have all the pieces to the puzzle fit and execute an attack like that... without help from those under his command?
Again, of course not. But in your initial sentence you question his responsibility. And the fact he'd built an organization that carried out 9/11 does in no way mean others beyond that organization were implicit. But it doesn't rule that out, either.
You call me a nut? You're the nut for even getting into this discussion. You opened the door. I closed it on you. I suggest now you back off big time because you've not only dug yourself a hole, you're adding to it.
“To quote you: “if one is to believe he is responsible for the 911 attacks and if one is to believe what he wrote
You flatly brought the question of OBL’s “responsibility” for 9/11. The implication, of course, is that “others” were responsible. “
Nonsense. Splitting hairs. You play a part in an attack you are culpable. No one man is an army. No one acted alone.
“I suggest now you back off big time because you’ve not only dug yourself a hole, you’re adding to it.”
Riiiiiiiighhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhht.