Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

None of the above (Brokered Convention for GOP?)
Washington Times ^ | December.19, 2007 | Tony Blankley

Posted on 12/19/2007 2:43:48 AM PST by Reagan Man

The Republican Party primary has so far been an exercise in none of the above. In their turns John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson and Mitt Romney seemed to be or seemed about to be frontrunners — only to fall back as the party's likely voters got a sharper look at each of them. Even my old boss Newt Gingrich, without even announcing, had a handsome surge from 4-5 percent to 18-20 percent in February — before falling back to single digits.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brokeredconvention; fredthompson; rmthread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Its a GOP bloodbath and both the MSM and the Dems are loving every minute of it.
1 posted on 12/19/2007 2:43:51 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

It is a Democratic bloodbath as well. Ironically all these states that moved up their primary to the early stages are gonna be disappointed when the real effort will be put in the later states in this primary.


2 posted on 12/19/2007 2:47:44 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Oh please the pubs are getting along a whole lot better than the uprisings the anointed good leader is getting. The next leader of the free world needs be tested to find if they have the character of their claims. Some of the GOP candidates can’t even remember what they did or said yesterday.


3 posted on 12/19/2007 2:54:27 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
It is as if each faction of the Grand Old Party feels a stronger passion to defeat its intra-party rival factions than to defeat the Democrats in November. This maximum instinct to deny the intra-party rival victory may be a sign of a philosophical rebirth (as in the Goldwater nomination and campaign of 1964), but it is also a sign of a party likely to lose the next general election.

There's really too much at stake to lose this election, it would cause damage that would have serious negative consequences. But on the other hand, the end result of such a long-term realignment -- being played out to its fullest -- might just give each faction of the GOP exactly what it wants...after about 20 years of incremental changes and numerous and untold expansions of the nanny-state through our legislative bodies.

4 posted on 12/19/2007 2:59:59 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

A good ol fashion brawl might be just what we need! Clean out the RINOs and spineless ones.


5 posted on 12/19/2007 3:02:07 AM PST by rrrod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I fear our intra-party fury will destroy all leaders and send us off to a brokered convention — and from thence probably to defeat. If the Democrats have their candidate by February and we are campaigning harshly until August — we would surely start in a deep hole.
I disagree that a brokered convention is a sure loser for the general election. It just might make us look like the more thoughtful party. The big question is how united we can become after the convention. If we're still fighting amongst ourselves after we choose a candidate, then Clinton will be president. Again.
6 posted on 12/19/2007 3:09:06 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rrrod

That’s a Lott of cleaning. And the cheerleader quit yesterday to start the RINO purge.


7 posted on 12/19/2007 3:13:28 AM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

Hey let’s all go back to a small tent and get rid of everybody that doesn’t agree 100% with ME, ME and ME. You know, it works every time it’s tried and if we just purge all those devils we’ll have fewer things to fight over which means fewer votes and of course the world will see how right we are and we’ll win, win, win. Uh huh, pass the Kool Aid.


8 posted on 12/19/2007 3:20:55 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
"Its a GOP bloodbath and both the MSM and the Dems are loving every minute of it."

Rep have 3 contenders relatively close in the numbers, likewise the Dems. Dem front runner and #2 seem to be tearing each other apart. Latest is a "love child" announcement about #3 contender Edwards. Are the Rep slinging mud at each other? Not that I can see relative to the libs.

Explain your "GOP bloodbath" claim, please, because I can't see it.

9 posted on 12/19/2007 3:23:35 AM PST by aroundabout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Not sure, true, but in recent history, a highly divisive primary DOES weaken the eventual nominee. Ford ‘76, Goldwater ‘64, fracture too slow to heal....


10 posted on 12/19/2007 3:24:48 AM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

What united the GOP was Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. Sure, elect Hillary and we will be united once again but at what cost?


11 posted on 12/19/2007 3:29:00 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

You’ve got a point. I guess it is worth worrying about. I’m hoping that long before the convention enough conservatives (social, economic and security, all) come to realize that FT is the logical choice that the convention won’t be brokered. Fred is not only the most logical choice for conservatives in this election (I know, I know, DH is better, blah, blah, blah [ain’t gonna happen!]), but is capable of uniting this party and ending all the bickering.


12 posted on 12/19/2007 3:29:55 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Naw. I respect Blankley very much. He's got a wisdom borne of no small experience. But...

NO ONE HAS VOTED YET!

13 posted on 12/19/2007 3:34:14 AM PST by Prospero (Ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Can’t we all just get behind Bob Dole instead? Worked in 1996. “People seemed to be content, $50 paid the rent, freaks were in a circus tent, those were the days.”


14 posted on 12/19/2007 3:41:28 AM PST by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

"Over the last year or two, one couldn't have lunch at the Capital Grille (a preferred dining spot for big-time D.C. Republican politicians and journalists) or other similar locations without hearing the constant complaint that the Bush White House was arrogant and wouldn't listen to their friends about Iraq and about domestic matters"

I'm sure those conversations were THE lunchtime topic of merit in all of the elite power centers including Washington DC of course. I'm not sure if the complaint is that Bush won't listen (he won't) or that the minions in those elite power centers don't wield their usual power in such matters.

I think this process is doing exactly what it should do - Vett the candidates to the electorate. Blankley's biggest complaint of all is that Huckabee's claims and statements on a great many issues are being tested and and have been found wanting. So, I guess in Blankley's preferred would we would just hold hands and get behind Huckabee and let the "professional" journalists script the examination of Huckabee to their more experienced liking. Got it.

I think the real complaint here is that these oh so professional journalists don't like losing control of being the ones to define the candidates to the electorate. The new media is whithering their power away and they don't like it one bit.

15 posted on 12/19/2007 3:45:17 AM PST by Carbonado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Good point. Uniting just for the sake of uniting is no solution. But surely you’re not suggesting that Fred Thompson is Bob Dole.


16 posted on 12/19/2007 3:57:17 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Oh, come on: you’re not blaming Ford in ‘76 on a divisive primary? There was was a divisive primary because Ford was the most hated man in the world.


17 posted on 12/19/2007 4:10:08 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
You bet I am. People forget real quick that Fred was just barely hanging on to his seat when he retired. He likely would not have been elected another term. Fred missed his calling. He would have made a great State Attorney General in Tennessee and in all fairness to the man he was great at bring down the most corrupt governor in Tennessee history. His first term as senator was great. His second one was at best dismal. Fred’s mind was elsewhere for a majority of it. Sorry but I think if he could not handle John Glenn then he sure can’t handle todays DEMs. He’ll pander to the liberal GOP quicker than you can say {in Freds 1999 words} “I support John McCain.” I like Ron Paul except on national defense. But I’ll gladly vote for Hunter though. The rest except for Paul, Hunter, or Tancredo, can forget about ever seeing a vote from me in the general election.
18 posted on 12/19/2007 4:19:02 AM PST by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dangus

He pardoned Nixon, that’s why, but if Reagan had gotten the GOP nomination instead, there would have been no Jimmy Carter.

1996 - yes, we united behind Bob Dole, who even picked Jack Kemp as VP for unity’s sake, but then we made the mistake the Democrat Party is about to by nominating somebody with sky-high negatives -”unelectability”.

And hers are 10+ higher than his ever were.


19 posted on 12/19/2007 4:20:30 AM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: samtheman; cva66snipe
Naw, I think he's just saying a fight is good instead of rallying around what we think is a safe candidate.

There are still 2 weeks left in Iowa and I haven't seen a real poll come out of Iowa in a week. I haven't seen a poll since the last debate. I figure one will be coming shortly which will have Fred moving up and perhaps McCain too. It took less than 2 weeks for Huckabee to catch fire so I figure Fred has a pretty good plan.

Look at Rudy, who is dropping fast when he once seemed inevitable. I saw a poll that had the Breck Girl up in Iowa amongst Dems when he was once a distant 3rd.

Fred has it right when he says people are to willing to call the game in the fourth quarter.

20 posted on 12/19/2007 4:25:21 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson