I think this means that Drudge, at least, thinks the story can be supported by evidence.
Although he vouched for the John Kerry affair story in 2004, too, which seemed to go nowhere.
The NQ does more fact checking than you might think. Drudge typically doesn’t go for supermarket stuff unless he has some other info. Wonder if this lady’s baby will have a nice head of silky hair.
“think this means that Drudge, at least, thinks the story can be supported by evidence.”
Or Drudge has been recently well funded and is subject to a certain ‘bias’ on what he will put on his website.
This is the third thing Drudge has ‘billed’ on his website lately, and the first two were no-shows.
How ‘easy’ would it be to get someone to ‘feed’ info to a major conservative website?