Then they had a duty to retract the malicious and inflammatory statements in the ad. Only one did so.
The difference between her act and that of the Duke students stripper/ho party is that the ignorant, bejeweled woman was not engaged in actively misusing another human being. So, while her act is ignorant, it is not also manipulative.
She is an adult who chose her line of work. She was hired to strip. She wanted the gig. BS to your misusing charge.
Maybe I was onto something after all in #255:
YOU: (Notice I did not say "IMMORAL thing to do.")
ME: Yes, I know what you didn't say, I just don't buy your explanation that risky behavior is your main concern. Your real issue in the lawsuit discussion is immorality, IMO.
If they didn’t retract their comments, then that’s an indicator that they believed them, isn’t it?
You don’t think that hiring a whore is misusing a human being?
Can I assume you think whoring is good for a person?