Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H; P-Marlowe
As I understand it, you are saying that a nurse might have violated some privacy act regarding the Duke players. Is that right?

This is a link to my original post on this thread. #172

Please read it if you have time. I think covers fairly well what I've been saying all along.

302 posted on 12/24/2007 4:31:02 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain! True Supporters of Our Troops Support the Necessity of their Sacrifice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
As I understand it, you are saying that a nurse might have violated some privacy act regarding the Duke players. Is that right?

No, and it's obvious you did not bother to inform yourself with the source I provided in #293. Your ignorance about this case is either a choice or a pretense, in my opinion.

Please read it if you have time. I think covers fairly well what I've been saying all along.

It doesn't cover your multiple claims that there were peripheral players named in the suit who believed the accuser's story. The honorable thing to do is to either back up your claim, or retract it.

Or do you just not care whether you write truthful things or not?

303 posted on 12/24/2007 5:15:09 AM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson