PaleoPaulie does not say that he will ask for a declaration of war if he is elected. He ius promising to flee in terror instead. If he so believes in declarations of war as necessary, why did he vote for a different sort of resolution authorizing force in Afghanistan???? Sorry, I forgot, paleoPaulie has a face on each side of many issues. That includes the necessity or non-necessity of declarations of war, and denouncing earmarks while stuffing Galveston earmarks into appropriations bills that he votes against knowing his colleagues will enact the bill and send the pork to Galveston (about four faces on that one).
Anyone capable of seeing knows enough not to give aid and comfort to Al Qaeda Paulie.
Well, I guess we are going to have disband the Air Force and put it back under the Army, the way it originally was.
LOL!
PaleoPaulie does not say that he will ask for a declaration of war if he is elected. He ius promising to flee in terror instead. If he so believes in declarations of war as necessary, why did he vote for a different sort of resolution authorizing force in Afghanistan???? Sorry, I forgot, paleoPaulie has a face on each side of many issues. That includes the necessity or non-necessity of declarations of war, and denouncing earmarks while stuffing Galveston earmarks into appropriations bills that he votes against knowing his colleagues will enact the bill and send the pork to Galveston (about four faces on that one). Anyone capable of seeing knows enough not to give aid and comfort to Al Qaeda Paulie.
Ron Paul states that a declaration of war should have been declared if we were serious about actually fighting and winning one.
As President, Ron Paul wouldn't declare war, Congress would.
So, it is not Ron Paul who is giving aid and confort to the enemy, it is the neocons controlling the foreign policy of this nation who are more concerned about spreading their globalism then in winning the WOT.