Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC: Black hole 'bully' blasts galaxy ~ ...Bad...Bad...Galactic Violence
BBC ^ | Monday, 17 December 2007, 18:35 GMT | Paul Rincon Science reporter, BBC News

Posted on 12/17/2007 2:39:20 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Black hole 'bully' blasts galaxy

By Paul Rincon


Science reporter, BBC News


Infographic, BBC

A powerful jet of particles from a "supermassive" black hole has been seen blasting a nearby galaxy, according to findings from the US space agency.

Galaxies have been seen colliding before, but it is the first time this form of galactic violence has been witnessed by astronomers.

This could have a profound effect on any planets in the jet's path and could also trigger a burst of star formation.

The findings are to be published in the Astrophysical Journal.

They were obtained using Nasa's space-based Chandra X-ray Observatory, its Hubble Space Telescope, and Spitzer Space Telescope, as well as the Very Large Array (VLA) and Merlin radio telescopes on the ground.

It is like a black hole bully, punching the nose of a passing galaxy

Neil Tyson, Hayden Planetarium

The event is occurring in a system called 3C321, which lies 1.4 billion light-years from Earth. It contains two galaxies in orbit around one another which are in the process of merging.

Most, if not all, galaxies - including our own Milky Way - are thought to host supermassive black holes at their galactic centres. A handful of these galaxies eject powerful jets from the vicinities of their black holes, and are known as radio galaxies - because jets are very "visible" at radio wavelengths.

The larger of the two galaxies in 3C321 - dubbed the "death star galaxy" by the astronomers - has a jet emanating from the vicinity of the black hole at its centre. The unfortunate smaller galaxy has apparently swung into the jet's line of fire.

Destructive force

A bright spot in some images shows where the jet has slammed into the side of the companion galaxy, dissipating some of its energy. After striking it, the jet has become disrupted and deflected.

Jets can race out at close to the speed of light and can travel vast distances. The jet in 3C321 was about 1,000 light-years across and might have travelled one or two million light-years from its origin.

The jet hits the galaxy at its edge


These jets consist of high energy particles and magnetic fields. They produce enormous amounts of radiation, especially in the form of high-energy X-rays and gamma-rays.

"We've seen many jets produced by black holes, but this is the first time we've seen one punch into another galaxy like we're seeing here," said Dan Evans, lead author from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, US.

"This jet could be causing all sorts of problems for the smaller galaxy it is pummeling."

The combined effects of this radiation and particles travelling at almost the speed of light could have disastrous consequences for the atmospheres of any Earth-like planets lying in the path of the jet.

Although we call it a death star galaxy, it might eventually be a source of new life in the more distant galaxy

Martin Hardcastle, University of Hertfordshire

For example, protective layers of ozone in the planet's upper atmosphere could be destroyed, which could result in the mass extinction of any life that had evolved on the planet.

Neil Tyson, director of the Hayden Planetarium in New York commented: "Black holes are famous for wreaking havoc on their environment. This particular black hole is disrupting its local region by dining on matter that wanders too close - which is the source of the energy for this jet.

"It also fires a jet out of the galaxy. So it is like a black hole bully, punching the nose of a passing galaxy."

Basic properties

"There are still basic unanswered questions about how these jets work," said co-author Martin Hardcastle of the University of Hertfordshire, UK.

"We don't know how exactly they're generated close to the black hole, what they're made of, how fast they're going, or how they evolve with time. So an object like 3C321 can act as an experiment which can give us an insight into the inner working of the jet."

The effect of the jet on the companion galaxy is likely to be substantial, because the galaxies in 3C321 are extremely close to one another. At only about 20,000 light years apart, these galaxies lie approximately the same distance as the Earth is from the centre of the Milky Way.

It is possible that it would not all be bad news for the galaxy being struck by the jet. The massive influx of energy and radiation from the jet may induce the formation of large numbers of stars and planets once its initial wake of destruction is complete.

"Although we call it a death star galaxy, in the end it might be a source of new life in the more distant galaxy," said Dr Hardcastle.

Features seen in images from the VLA and Chandra indicate that the jet started hitting the smaller galaxy about one million years ago. This is a blink of the eye in the lifetime of 3C321, which marks it out as an important opportunity to study a rare astronomical phenomenon, say the astronomers.

Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk




TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: blackhole

1 posted on 12/17/2007 2:39:21 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Darth Vader’s fault.


2 posted on 12/17/2007 2:42:31 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Obviously need a sign indicating “No Blasting Adjacent Galaxies”.


3 posted on 12/17/2007 2:45:33 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Women and minorities hurt worst.
4 posted on 12/17/2007 2:47:34 PM PST by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"There are still basic unanswered questions about how these jets work," said co-author Martin Hardcastle of the University of Hertfordshire, UK.
Doesn't surprise me that this is unanswered.

I always thought black holes suck, not blow.

5 posted on 12/17/2007 2:47:59 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Oh, and It’s Bush’s fault.


6 posted on 12/17/2007 2:48:14 PM PST by fireforeffect (A kind word and a 2x4, gets you more than just a kind word.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Is this occuring now or are we just now seeing the light from something that happend a billion years ago?


7 posted on 12/17/2007 2:50:26 PM PST by joebuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joebuck

It would appear the events we’re “seeing” occured 1.4 billion years ago.


8 posted on 12/17/2007 2:52:57 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Black holes are famous for wreaking havoc on their environment.

I blame Big Oil. And of course President Bush.

9 posted on 12/17/2007 2:53:25 PM PST by KarlInOhio (Government is the hired help - not the boss. When politicians forget that they must be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The bigger galaxy just told the smaller one to “pull my finger.”


10 posted on 12/17/2007 2:57:34 PM PST by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fireforeffect

I suppose that now we will be expected to purchase carbon off-sets for this.


11 posted on 12/17/2007 3:08:32 PM PST by AlternateViewpoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Black holes do suck, but their sucking results in a blowing side-effect. :)

When a black hole is sucking in a piece of solid matter, the rate of change of gravitational force on that piece of matter is so great that it tends to rip the piece of matter apart. When it gets ripped apart, the parts that are closer to the black hole fall in, but the parts that were further away can often escape.

It’s like this. Imagine you have a big long stick. (Before you start thinking about sticks and sucking and blowing, keep in mind that this stick will be broken in half by the end of this thought experiment). This stick is drifting merrily along through space, when suddenly a black hole comes along and starts sucking that stick in. Now, the stick is going to start falling into the black hole, and whichever half of the stick happened to be closer to the black hole first will end up feeling much more gravity from the hole than the side that’s farther away from it. So, if the stick wasn’t “pointed” at the hole to start with, the difference in gravitational force between the near side and the far side of the stick is going to make the stick whip quickly into orientation towards the hole. This whipping action could be so quick that the stick will snap in half, and if that happens, the far end will fly off into space while the near end falls into the hole. If the whipping action doesn’t cause it to break in half right there, don’t worry, it’ll get another chance. The stick typically won’t fall *straight* into the black hole, but will miss it by a hair, which means the black hole will try to turn it around, with even more force this time. Eventually either the black hole grabs the whole stick, or it flips it around so sharply that the stick breaks in half after all (with the more distant half flying off into space).

Now, instead of sticks, picture this happening to diatomic molecules, and you can see how black holes often eject gas clouds.


12 posted on 12/17/2007 3:14:16 PM PST by Omedalus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

legislation is pending...


13 posted on 12/17/2007 4:20:24 PM PST by PsyOp (Truth in itself is rarely sufficient to make men act. - Clauswitz, On War, 1832.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Omedalus

Very interesting. Thanks for the explanation.


14 posted on 12/17/2007 5:08:09 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson