Replies

Are we clear?

Yes, we are clear. You are clearly willing to put forth a conveniently revisionist history of orthodox Christian doctrine, couple it with a gross misrepresentation of the means by which the doctrine of the Trinity is derived, and then pass off "my version" of Jesus as being the product of a sun-worshipping emperor while yours is "defined by the Bible" (and not by some false prophet who sings things in his hat and can make a good story out of an incomplete portion of heiroglyphics).

You have certainly perfected the art of playing the victim here. Your argument above MIGHT have helped you if you were arguing against somebody who put their trust in creeds and councils over and above Scripture, but I do not place such trust in them.

For one blustering on about everybody misrepresenting their beliefs, you sure do a fantastic job of just that very thing.

Yes, we are clear. You are clearly willing to put forth a conveniently revisionist history of orthodox Christian doctrine,

Thank you, I assure you I have far more backup than the anti's here do with what they say about my church, did you bother to go to the Documents at the Catholic encyclopedia, or did you just decide I was wrong from "Common knowledge"?

couple it with a gross misrepresentation of the means by which the doctrine of the Trinity is derived,

Did you read the Catholic records, or not? That is where I Got all that, from the actual historical records. If you have a beef, start asking the Catholics to conceal their history form the Internet (it's too late BTW)

and then pass off "my version" of Jesus as being the product of a sun-worshiping emperor while yours is "defined by the Bible"

Honestly, that is my perspective, but then I know I have a perspective, you are still acting as if your perspective is reality, LOL!

(and not by some false prophet who sings things in his hat and can make a good story out of an incomplete portion of hieroglyphics).

Joseph may or may not have sung through his hat, but I could make some comments about people speaking through theirs here.

You have certainly perfected the art of playing the victim here.

Man! and I was going for Comic relief! Lets see "Tragedy + Distance (in either Time or Space) = Humor" Yep the formula is still right. Must be my delivery.

Your argument above MIGHT have helped you if you were arguing against somebody who put their trust in creeds and councils over and above Scripture, but I do not place such trust in them.

So you do not buy into the great three in one ~~Oil~~ Theory? How about the Bible, is it complete and inerrant?

For one blustering on about everybody misrepresenting their beliefs, you sure do a fantastic job of just that very thing.

Really? Where exactly did I get my facts wrong? Please read my page and tell me any place where I have my facts wrong. I also tried to keep clear with formating and language where I am quoting and where I am Opining.