[RatsDawg]

“Look, the Times wrote an encyclopedia on the “Plame Affair” and all the liberals got from that was that “Cheney ruthlessly exposed an enemy”.”

I am currently taking an American Government class at my local college. During one class period we were talking about current events, and one was about Kucinich wanting the impeachment of George Bush. A student asked the professor, “What would they impeach him for? Do they really have anything?” My professor then went on a rant about how she “Thinks” Cheney had something to do with the Plame Affair. She said that she “Thinks” the Bush Administration put out Valerie Plames name just to put her in danger, because the Bush Administration hates her husband for what he did in Niger.

Her “facts” and arguements for the whole deal really made me question her intelligence. I don’t think she knew that Plame was NOT covert. I don’t think she knows that Libby was NOT convicted for spilling the beans on Plame but for lying under oath.

I was going to blurt out, “So if her life is in SO much danger, why did she pose in Time Magazine?”

[Ann Archy]

That same person wants the VIDEO released of waterboarding so REALLY COVERT agents can be EXPOSED!!

[cgbg]

You might want to gently remind your Prof that Richard Armitage has already admitted that he was the source of the Plame leak.

(You can search here for many sources for this.)

If you want to blow your Prof's mind, ask him a question.

Who was Richard Armitage's boss--a man never mentioned in connection with this "affair" who most likely was the cause of it?

(Answer: Colin Powell)