Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Greenland Melt Accelerating
Terra Daily ^ | 12/12/2007 | Staff Writers

Posted on 12/14/2007 8:46:14 AM PST by cogitator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: wita
So, has there been a corresponding rise in sea levels?

Yes.


21 posted on 12/14/2007 9:01:20 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Hallelujah, Greenland will be Green again.
22 posted on 12/14/2007 9:01:22 AM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104; cogitator
And Boston just had a blizzard that left 12" of snow in some places.

Breaking the 1901 record of 7"!

Global CONFUSION!

Algor OBFUSCATION!


23 posted on 12/14/2007 9:02:20 AM PST by Lady Jag (Fall seven times, stand up eight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag
And Boston just had a blizzard that left 12" of snow in some places.

I just checked the calendar -- I was pretty certain this is December. I'm sure glad I'm right about that.

24 posted on 12/14/2007 9:03:27 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

The centimeters on this graph are almost twice the size of actual centimeters.


25 posted on 12/14/2007 9:05:12 AM PST by xcullen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Why are the satellite measurements outside of the range of uncertainty of the IPCC scenarios?
26 posted on 12/14/2007 9:07:26 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Did you actually read the post?

Have you lived in Mass.? We often don't get any snow till after Christmas and we've just had a 12" blizzard and are expecting another stronger snowstorm on Sunday.

Hasn't happened for 100 years that we've gotten this much snow, algor.

27 posted on 12/14/2007 9:08:23 AM PST by Lady Jag (Fall seven times, stand up eight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xcullen

28 posted on 12/14/2007 9:08:33 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Gee, I wonder why they named it GREENLAND.....


29 posted on 12/14/2007 9:09:08 AM PST by Badeye (Free Willie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

30 posted on 12/14/2007 9:09:10 AM PST by andyandval
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: avacado
Why are the satellite measurements outside of the range of uncertainty of the IPCC scenarios?

Because the IPCC scenarios are conservative.

31 posted on 12/14/2007 9:09:18 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Steffen and his team have been using a rotating laser and a sophisticated digital camera and high-definition camera system provided by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory to map the volume and geometry of moulins on the Greenland ice sheet to a depth of more than 1,500 feet.

"We know the number of moulins is increasing," said Steffen. "The bigger question is how much water is reaching the bed of the ice sheet, and how quickly it gets there."

Maybe it's that dadgummed "rotating laser" punching holes in the ice-cap!

Did these so-called "scientists" ever think of that while they were tossing back the Danish schnapps and chasing the Greenland girls in the snow?

I ask you!

32 posted on 12/14/2007 9:10:00 AM PST by headsonpikes (Genocide is the highest sacrament of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Does this threaten the “conveyor belt”?


33 posted on 12/14/2007 9:10:37 AM PST by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
"Because the IPCC scenarios are conservative."

Really? Do you have a link to back that up? Models predict ranges within a certain level of certainty.

34 posted on 12/14/2007 9:11:08 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lady Jag
We often don't get any snow till after Christmas

"The ‘snow history’ of Boston, like any other thing about Boston, is interesting. Records since 1920 show that the earliest date of first snowfall (1" in a day) was Nov. 10, 1976 while the latest was Jan. 29, 1928. The mean date is Dec. 12. The earliest date for the last snowfall (1" in a day) was Nov. 24, 1936 and the latest was Apr. 28, 1987. The mean date is Mar. 20. The greatest seasonal snowfall was 107.6" in 1995-96 while the least was 8.2" in 1936-1937. The mean seasonal snowfall is 41.3". The most snow in 24 hours was recorded as 27" on Feb. 17-18, 2003. The average snow per month happens to be 12.8" for Feb. and 12" for Jan. The snowstorm climatology (1952 to 1992) for Boston shows that the average number of snowstorms (resulting in at least 1" snow) per season is 10.33, out of which six have resulted in snow in the range of 1" to 2.9"."

1936 was the record warm year in the continental United States, I think; I'm guessing that it didn't snow in Boston the rest of that winter.

35 posted on 12/14/2007 9:13:51 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

“The current contribution of Greenland ice melt to global sea levels is about 0.5 millimeters annually.”

Wow, a whole inch in fifty years.


36 posted on 12/14/2007 9:14:20 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
1936 was the record warm year in the continental United States

And it was ALL AMERICA'S FAULT! If Stalin had been clever, he would have found a way to exploit that the way the global warming movement is doing today.

37 posted on 12/14/2007 9:16:27 AM PST by denydenydeny (Expel the priest and you don't inaugurate the age of reason, you get the witch doctor--Paul Johnson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
If the Greenland ice sheet is melting, would it be the 10,000th time that it did melt or would it be the 20,000th time that it melted?
38 posted on 12/14/2007 9:18:09 AM PST by kempo (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Ted Kennedy farted: "Whoooaa! Excuse me. Hey, look at those penguins run."
39 posted on 12/14/2007 9:18:17 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
Maybe it's that dadgummed "rotating laser" punching holes in the ice-cap!

We need help!


40 posted on 12/14/2007 9:18:18 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson