You condemn us because we do not condemn this woman? I would not choose to have a child at 66. However, I think that if a woman with a chronic illness or a condition such as blindness or other disability chooses to have a baby, and can provide for her child and even have g-dparents chosen for her child should something happen to her, then I have other worries that are more concerning.
The poor kids growing up in gang-infested areas with druggie, sleep-around mothers and no fathers are indeed FAR worse off. And some of their offspring are being raised by grandmas no younger than this mother.
My only wish for this woman is that she beats the cancer and lives a long, healthy life.
Do you see me condemning anyone Yaelle except this woman? Point it out & I didn't condemn you I just shook my head at you. It really irked me you had to go & say People, focus your ire and opinions more toward the young, single, poor women who are having babies. Those children are in far MORE trouble. Not all young woman stay single , poor or are have children who are in far more trouble either.Some do stay in their gang infested areas. But there are plenty of young woman who don't get pregnant on purpose but chose to be mothers rather then abort.Many are able to go to school and get their lives on track you know. I know some even! I do agree that children are raised by grandparents & thats fine if they are able & willing to do that if the need is there.
However this woman lied to get the doctors to help her in the first place & as I did point out she could have chosen to get pregnant at a younger age then 66 yrs old. It is selfish to have children fully knowing that you are not in any shape to be there for them as all of you age. I have my opinion & you have yours. I don't feel its fair to God parents to raise your children because you feel the need at 66 yrs old to finally have children. We do agree on one thing..I wish her well & hope she can beat the cancer. ~Pandora~