Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exxon Mobil aims to put LNG terminal off New Jersey
AP via Houston Chronicle ^ | Dec. 11, 2007 | Associated Press

Posted on 12/12/2007 4:40:13 AM PST by thackney

DALLAS — Exxon Mobil Corp. said Tuesday it wants to anchor a floating liquefied natural gas terminal 20 miles off New Jersey.

The receiving terminal would cost more than $1 billion to build and be able to supply about 1.2 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day, enough for more than 5 million residential customers, to New York and New Jersey, Exxon Mobil said.

If regulators approve the terminal, it would go into operation in the middle of the next decade, Exxon Mobil said.

Many power plants built in the last decade burn natural gas, which is seen as cleaner than coal. But high natural gas prices have sent homeowners' electric bills soaring in many parts of the country and have raised concern about power supplies.

Exxon Mobil is working on three other liquefied natural gas terminal projects near Sabine Pass, Texas, in Wales, and off the Adriatic coast of Italy.

Exxon Mobil has run into opposition from residents and environmentalists at some proposed sites in the U.S.

Jeff Tittel, executive director of the New Jersey chapter of the Sierra Club, said his organization was not opposed to liquefied natural gas "because we think it's a lot cleaner than coal" and produces lower emissions of greenhouse gases.

Tittel said the offshore location was an advantage because a terminal on land would be more vulnerable to terrorism.

"If one of them ever exploded, it would pretty much destroy everything within a mile," he said.

The vessel to be anchored off New Jersey is called BlueOcean Energy and will be designed to receive supplies of liquefied natural gas from ships about twice a week. It would be connected to the mainland through a new subsea pipeline, probably reaching shore in Raritan Bay.

The project is at the beginning of what the Irving-based company called "a lengthy and rigorous permitting process" involving the public, state and federal agencies.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: energy; lng; naturalgas

1 posted on 12/12/2007 4:40:14 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney
As the President of the Sierra Club of Bayonne, NJ, I, personally, and our “Club” unanimously and fully support the building of the LPNG port offshore of “The Garden State”, as it will clearly improve both the view and the quality of our lives. Nuf said!


2 posted on 12/12/2007 5:01:08 AM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jws3sticks

We need more industry in NJ and if there’s anything we know well it’s energy (or in this case, gas).

Bayonne in particular needs more industry to pay property taxes. MOTBY should be an industrial site.


3 posted on 12/12/2007 5:29:58 AM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson