Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ajay_kumar

Good answer.

I will never skip a general election or waste my vote in order to ‘send a message’. My preference of republican candidates in descending order would be:
1) Duncan Huntere (i’ve already given up on him as not viable)
2) Fred Thompson (hoping his campaign will show some signs of life)
3) Mitt Romney (some management skills, currently professes correct positions on most issues, doubts about his wafflyness)
4) McCain (many of his stands have irrated me, but he has been firm on the WOT, Life, and fiscal restraint, also a genuine hero despite his irratating temper)
5) Guiliani (way too much personal baggage and not a conservative, but better than hillary)
6) Huckabee (some wacky positions have emerged, and he would be smeered by the press as a wacky televangilist)
7) Tancredo (I like him but he has no chance at all, he’s sacrificed his political viability to be a hero on one issue)

I would vote for any of these before considering a vote for Clinton, Obama or Edwards.

The only candidate in the republican field who would make me consider Clinton or Edwards is Ron Paul, and no candidate would make me consider Obama.


320 posted on 12/09/2007 8:59:59 PM PST by CaptainMorgantown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: CaptainMorgantown
The way things are shaping out, the nominee will be either
Rudy, Fred, Mitt or Huck. I have preference for Mitt because
his success in real business world, but they are all acceptable.

If Paul is the nominee, there is a small chance I may stay
home. My nose is too big to hold and vote for Hillary or Barack
or Johnny boy.

333 posted on 12/09/2007 10:29:44 PM PST by ajay_kumar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson