[Kurt Evans]

“Without doing empirical research using the scientific method, creationism cannot lay claim to any associations with science.”

Empirical research using the scientific method has yet to demonstrate the unequivocally positive nature of a single mutation.

[Rudder]

Empirical research using the scientific method has yet to demonstrate the unequivocally positive nature of a single mutation.

Far out...really. The extant life forms wouldn't like to hear that.

[chuckles]

The most irrefutable evidence that evolution is impossible is mathematics. If you plug in the numbers that the wildest evo’s use for the age of the universe, and suppose a mutation every second, there hasn’t been enough seconds to even build the simplest virus DNA by chance. I don’t have the exact number, but it was something on the order of 10 to the 32 power to 1 for the off chance of life coming about by accident. The mathematician even gave evo’s a head start and said, OK lets assume the first few seconds a combo came about that created life. There still wasn’t enough time to mutate that life into anything else before now. To assume that a whale crawled out of the water and became a cow is mathematically impossible in the billions of years assumed by evo’s. Ergo, the new postulation that we had “hopeful monsters”. That is where a lizard lays an egg and a bird pops out. Kind of a stretch, even for evo’s.