The article doesn’t say Reagan was pro-abortion, it says he was for abortion rights before he was against them.
A distinction without a difference.
Read more here:
Adamantly pro-choice? Ronald Reagan and abortion in 1967.
RedState.com ^ | Aug. 22, 2007 | Mark Kilmer
Posted on 08/23/2007 7:40:29 AM EDT by Josh Painter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1885297/posts
______________________________________________
And here:
Adamantly pro-choice? Ronald Reagan and abortion in 1967.
The governor is innocent of Romney’s charge.
Here are Reagan’s own words:
“Now, with regard to the permissive bill I supposedly signed, let me give you the correct history of what took place early in my term as governor.
“A bill was introduced that was permissive, indeed was abortion on demand. Naturally, there was great controversy about this bill. The author finally sent word that he would amend his bill to anything the governor would sign. Faced with this responsibility, I probably did more study and more soul searching on the subject that I had done on anything in my eight years as governor.
“I came to the conclusion, as I have already stated, that it [abortion] could only be justified to save a human life. The matter of health—meaning the permanent damage to the health of the mother if she went through with her pregnancy—was brought up.
“It seemed to me that the mother would have the right to protect herself from permanent damage just as she would be able to protect herself, even if it meant taking a life, from someone threatening her with mayhem, so I agreed to that provision. I thought there was adequate provision in the bill requiring responsible boards in the medical profession to declare such permanent harm would follow the birth of the child.
“Perhaps it was my inexperience in government, but, like so many pieces of legislation, there were loopholes that I had not seen, and the thing that made the California abortion bill become somewhat permissive in nature was violation of the spirit of the legislation by the groups that were supposed to police it.
“This was particularly true in the case of psychiatrists. If faced with the same problem today, I can assure you I would make sure there were no loopholes in the bill.”