[elhombrelibre]

It’s a non-issue. There is no road. There is no funding for the “road.” It’s bogus and demagogic.

[WorkerbeeCitizen]

As someone who is interested in learning about this, both sides, do you have any supporting documentation one way or the other?

[antinomian]

It’s a non-issue. There is no road. There is no funding for the “road.” It’s bogus and demagogic.

Sure. The Texas govenor and legislature just spent the last year fighting each other over this because it doesn't exist.

[Cvengr]

You're right. It isn't just one road, it'f four corridors from Mexico through the US to Canada and in one area to Alaska.

[lentulusgracchus]

It’s a non-issue. There is no road. There is no funding for the “road.” It’s bogus and demagogic.

Those must not have been bulldozers and road-graders I saw working on that huge "inland port" complex north of Fort Worth on I-35W a year ago last month. They were all figments of my imagination, a complete coincidence, or better still, I'm an idiot fabricator of nonexistent earth-moving equipment, and a deliberate liar.

There is no NASCO, no SPP, no bipartisan Congressional committee with real, live chairmen, no money, no nothing. It's all a tissue of lies, a black-helicopter fantasy.

Don't back off now -- stick to your guns.

[Halgr]

Well paul is right about a few things....

Believe me NAFTA and the “Road” are not figments of imagination/

No its not funded by America....have you noticed who is REALLY Funding the road?????

I’ve done the research....have you?